Home > technology, typing > >Dvorak keyboard

>Dvorak keyboard

>I have been wanting to try a Dvorak keyboard. I did not see them available at computer stores. I had an old keyboard at home so I flicked off all the keys and repositioned them. In Windows Control Panel under Regional and Language Options one can add the Dvorak layout: click Options in the Languages tab. I don’t usually have the language bar open but it is now displayed to allow switching back to Qwerty. I have my other keyboard on the desk but need to plug it in as both keyboards have PS/2 connectors, not USB. Though I suspect one could have 2 keyboards attached concurrently.

Initially Windows would switch back to Qwerty intermittently, for no clear reason to me, so I switched the default to Dvorak.

Why do this? Well it is apparently more ergonomic. Qwerty is designed to minimise stuck typebars. Which was relevant with typewriters in the 19th century but irrelevant now. Dvorak places commonly used letters in the middle letter row. Letter frequency depends slightly on writing style but is generally

e t a o i n s r h l d c u m f p g w y b v k x j q z

So the 10 letters in the Dvorak main row come from the 13 most commonly typed letters.

There is dispute whether Dvorak is actually faster. The typing speed record was set on a Dvorak keyboard, but even if speed is similar for both layouts for most people, it is possible that typing strain injuries are less on a better designed keyboard.

How have I found it? Slower, especially initially. I was back to looking at the keyboard while I typed. Looking at the keyboard is not much of an issue as I type from thought, not written text. I am still using the old layout at work which may hinder uptake, though I am not certain it is, and either way it doesn’t concern me. I see no reason why someone cannot be competent with both and comfortably switch between layouts.

However I think it has changed what I type because I have to slow my thoughts to the speed I type. While one can think faster than he types, I could type at a reasonable speed with Qwerty, a speed that matched well enough finding the words I needed to express my ideas. I cannot do this yet with Dvorak. Is my writing better or worse for the slower typing? I don’t know. Though improvement in my writing style is more likely to come with practice and better proofreading rather than typing speed.

Mistakes on this keyboard are probably more frequent, though I used backspace too frequently on Qwerty. Spelling errors, incorrect doubled letters, missed word spaces. Dropped letters (and I am unaware of it at the time) are more frequent now whereas they were nearly non-existent previously. And of course occasionally confusing key placement for Qwerty location. The letter “A” is the only letter that is in the same position in both layouts.

Punctuation is different and seems a little more difficult and less logical.

I will probably persist for a while.

Others have suggest Dvorak is too different from Qwerty for the masses to adopt and have recommended an improved but Qwerty-like layout, the Colemak. Though I think the “B” position (Qwerty) is the most difficult to consistently use the correct fingering, and should have been traded for “X” or “Z.”

Categories: technology, typing
  1. 2009 November 28 at 03:22

    What if you hunt and peck like I do? lol. I can type about 45 wpm.

  2. 2009 November 28 at 05:13

    Force yourself to use the correct fingering. It will slow you initially, but your speed will gain rapidly and improve on your current rate.
    Index to F and J (Qwerty), and the rest follow.

  3. Anne
    2009 November 30 at 05:44

    I think the Dvorak would be a disaster for me. I learned to type 37 years ago, on an olivetti, with a slam carriage. Changing to the golfball provided a few challenges as the key spacing was changed.
    Now, the computer boards for qwerty have against changed the spacing.
    For long time touch typists this is a total pain, since the capslock lines up exactly with where the A should be, and the spacing is ergonomically incorrect.
    at one stage Microsoft put out a board which was just about right, but it came and went in a flash and when my one and only board cremated, I had to put up with the shonk that I have now.
    For those who learned to touchtype to the point where letters are typed by muscle memory, not mental effort, any change simply won’t ever be quicker, because something ingrained for 37 years, would be nigh on impossible to be pounded into the brain and replicated that way.
    So regardless of the shape of keyboard and idiotic space placement of keys, … no doubt thought up by the nerdy hunt and peck brigade, who never understood the advantages of touch typing …. for me, there is no option.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: